Usage / Role
54%
Regular defensive contributor
Player Dossier
2016-2018Clemson
LB • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Roswell, GA, USA
Tre Lamar shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.3 disruption score.
Usage / Role
54%
Regular defensive contributor
Impact Production
60
Solid production for a linebacker
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
52
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Player Story
Tre Lamar built his college career from 2016 through 2018 as a linebacker from Roswell, GA wearing No. 57, spending time with Clemson. The clearest part of Tre Lamar's career was his defensive production: 141...
Read the storyTre Lamar, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Clemson. Tre Lamar shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.3 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 10 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 19.3 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 10 | 16 | 3 | 1 | - | 1 | 0 | 19.3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 10 | 51 | 5.5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 51.1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 13 | 5 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 60.8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 13 | 68 | 5.5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 60.8 |
Related Context
Tre Lamar played LB for Clemson. Across 3 tracked seasons, Tre Lamar recorded 141 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Clemson paired 15.5 primary output with 35.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
35.3
Usage
7.4
Consistency
45.9
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 1. Furman: 0. Texas A&M: 0.5. Georgia Southern: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Syracuse: 2. Wake Forest: 5. NC State: 0. Florida State: 1. Louisville: 1. Boston College: 0. Duke: 2. Pittsburgh: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 5 by 30.8. Furman: 4 by 16.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 21.7. Georgia Southern: 11 by 45.8. Georgia Tech: 4 by 16.7. Syracuse: 10 by 61.7. Wake Forest: 8 by 83.3. NC State: 1 by 4.2. Florida State: 3 by 22.5. Louisville: 2 by 18.3. Boston College: 4 by 16.7. Duke: 8 by 53.3. Pittsburgh: 9 by 67.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Wake Forest
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Notre Dame | W 30-3 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/2 | @ PittsburghSplash game | W 42-10 | 9 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs DukeSplash game | W 35-6 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Boston College | W 27-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Louisville | W 77-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida State | W 59-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs NC State | W 41-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Wake Forest2+ sacks · Splash game | W 63-3 | 8 | 6 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Syracuse10+ tackles · Splash game | W 27-23 | 10 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 49-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Southern10+ tackles | W 38-7 | 11 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Texas A&M | W 28-26 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Furman | W 48-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Tre Lamar built his college career from 2016 through 2018 as a linebacker from Roswell, GA wearing No. 57, spending time with Clemson. The clearest part of Tre Lamar's career was his defensive production: 141 tackles, 14 tackles for loss, 8 sacks, and 1 interception across 33 career games in the available record. That gives Tre Lamar's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 5 | 12.1 | 2.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 5 | 12.1 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 12.5 | 33.7 | 6.4 | 7.5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 15.5 | 35.3 | 7.4 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 15.5 | 35.3 | 7.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Georgia Tech
Week 9 · W 24-10 · Conference game
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Havoc Plays
95.3 takeover
4 disruption/tackle impact with 95.3 takeover score.
#2
@ Wake Forest
Week 6 · W 63-3 · Conference game
5
Havoc Plays
94.4 takeover
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 94.4 takeover score.
#3
@ Pittsburgh
Week 14 · W 42-10 · Conference game
3
Havoc Plays
75.8 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 75.8 takeover score.
#4
vs Auburn
Week 2 · W 14-6
3
Havoc Plays
67.5 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67.5 takeover score.
#5
vs Syracuse
Week 5 · W 27-23 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
67.2 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 67.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · Clemson
15.5 primary output · 35.3 efficiency · 7.4 usage
60.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Clemson
60.8
15.5 primary · 35.3 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Clemson
51.1
12.5 primary · 33.7 efficiency · 6.4 usage
6
Impact games
9
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.