Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2017-2021Clemson
Will Spiers
P • 6'5" • 225 lbs • Cameron, SC, USA
Impact contributor
Will Spiers shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Clemson
17171818191920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 10
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Will Spiers, P. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Clemson. Will Spiers shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Clemson paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Clemson
Games
15
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Ohio State: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Syracuse: 0. Charlotte: 0. North Carolina: 0. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 0. Boston College: 0. Unknown: 0. NC State: 0. Wake Forest: 0. South Carolina: 0. Virginia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 13
First Half0 · Games = 8 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs First Half
All Games0 · Games = 15
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
— vs LSU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/14 | @ LSU | L 25-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 12/29 | @ Ohio State | W 29-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 12/8 | vs Virginia | W 62-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ South Carolina | W 38-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Wake Forest | W 52-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -21 | -21 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ NC State | W 55-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Boston College | W 59-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisville | W 45-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Florida State | W 45-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ North Carolina | W 21-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Charlotte | W 52-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Syracuse | W 41-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Texas A&M | W 24-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Georgia Tech | W 52-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201720182018201920192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0
Primary metric
0 primary-metric impact.
#2
Miami
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
South Carolina
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Unknown
0
Primary metric
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Florida State
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Clemson
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2017 Regular Season · Clemson
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Clemson
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
10
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 68 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.