Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2016-2020Clemson
WR • 6'0" • 210 lbs • Greenville, NC, USA
Cornell Powell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.9
Efficiency
46
Consistency
39.9
Season Value
27.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cornell Powell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson. Cornell Powell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Clemson paired 882 primary output with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
12.2
Efficiency
46
Usage
6.9
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 13. Texas A&M: 2. Charlotte: 2. North Carolina: -1. Florida State: 7. Louisville: 10. Boston College: 25. Unknown: 46. NC State: 4. South Carolina: 14
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 1 by 86.7. Texas A&M: 1 by 13.3. Charlotte: 1 by 13.3. North Carolina: 1 by 0. Florida State: 2 by 23.3. Louisville: 1 by 66.7. Boston College: 2 by 83.3. Unknown: 3 by 100. NC State: 1 by 26.7. South Carolina: 2 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ South Carolina | W 38-3 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ NC State | W 55-10 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Boston College | W 59-7 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisville | W 45-10 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Florida State | W 45-14 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ North Carolina | W 21-20 | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Charlotte | W 52-10 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Texas A&M | W 24-10 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Georgia Tech | W 52-14 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 87 | 48.8 | 9.3 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 57 | 52.2 | 5.7 | -30 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 57 | 52.2 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 63 | 54.8 | 8.3 | 6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 122 | 46 | 6.9 | 59 |
| 2020 Postseason | Clemson | 882 | 77.9 | 16.7 | 760 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 882 | 77.9 | 16.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
176
Primary metric
176 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
46
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Notre Dame
161
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
42
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
139
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Clemson
882 primary output · 77.9 efficiency · 16.7 usage
60.8
#2
2020 Regular Season · Clemson
60.8
882 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 16.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Clemson
28.6
57 primary · 52.2 efficiency · 5.7 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9344
J.H. Rose · Greenville, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,211
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cornell Powell quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit