Usage Score
16.7
Player Dossier
2016-2020Clemson
Cornell Powell
WR • 6'0" • 210 lbs • Greenville, NC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cornell Powell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.9
Consistency
48.7
Season Value
60.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson
16171718192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cornell Powell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson. Cornell Powell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Clemson paired 882 primary output with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Clemson
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
73.5
Efficiency
77.9
Usage
16.7
Consistency
48.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 139. Wake Forest: 15. Unknown: 25. Virginia: 5. Miami: 12. Georgia Tech: 50. Syracuse: 45. Boston College: 105. Notre Dame: 161. Pittsburgh: 176. Virginia Tech: 90. Notre Dame: 59
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 8 by 100. Wake Forest: 2 by 50. Unknown: 2 by 83.3. Virginia: 2 by 16.7. Miami: 2 by 40. Georgia Tech: 4 by 83.3. Syracuse: 2 by 100. Boston College: 11 by 63.6. Notre Dame: 6 by 100. Pittsburgh: 6 by 100. Virginia Tech: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 98.3
Split Comparison
Wins61.9 · n=9 · -88.1 vs Losses
Losses150 · n=2 · +88.1 vs Wins
First Half41 · n=6 · -65 vs Second Half
Second Half106 · n=6 · +65 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-49 | — | 8 | 139 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 12/19 | @ Notre Dame | W 34-10 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ Virginia Tech | W 45-10 | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards | W 52-17 | — | 6 | 176 | 29.3 | 29.30 | 1 | 70 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards | L 40-47 | — | 6 | 161 | 26.8 | 26.80 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-28 | — | 11 | 105 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Syracuse | W 47-21 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Georgia Tech | W 73-7 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Miami | W 42-17 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Virginia | W 41-23 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Wake Forest | W 37-13 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 87 | 48.8 | 9.3 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 57 | 52.2 | 5.7 | -30 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 57 | 52.2 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 63 | 54.8 | 8.3 | 6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 122 | 46 | 6.9 | 59 |
| 2020 Postseason | Clemson | 882 | 77.9 | 16.7 | 760 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 882 | 77.9 | 16.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
176
Primary metric
176 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
46
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Notre Dame
161
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
42
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
139
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Clemson
882 primary output · 77.9 efficiency · 16.7 usage
60.8
#2
2020 Regular Season · Clemson
60.8
882 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 16.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Clemson
28.6
57 primary · 52.2 efficiency · 5.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9344
J.H. Rose · Greenville, NC
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,211
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.