Player Stats

Trayvon Mullen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
86
TFL
3.5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonClemson51-0-1017.7
2016 Regular SeasonClemson5150.50--017.7
2017 PostseasonClemson133-0--037.6
2017 Regular SeasonClemson1337-013037.6
2018 PostseasonClemson135-0--039.1
2018 Regular SeasonClemson132531-3039.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Clemson paired 8 primary output with 16.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 16.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Clemson

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

16.5

Usage

2.9

Consistency

15.4

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 1. Notre Dame: 0. Furman: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia Tech: 2. Syracuse: 0. NC State: 0. Florida State: 1. Louisville: 0. Boston College: 1. Duke: 2. South Carolina: 0. Pittsburgh: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 5 by 20.8. Furman: 1 by 14.2. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 24.2. Syracuse: 1 by 4.2. NC State: 2 by 8.3. Florida State: 5 by 30.8. Louisville: 2 by 8.3. Boston College: 5 by 30.8. Duke: 1 by 24.2. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half0.6 · Games = 7 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · Games = 6 · +0.1 vs First Half