Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2016-2021Texas Tech
DB • 5'11" • 205 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Eric Monroe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.2
Efficiency
31.7
Consistency
46.8
Season Value
24
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · LSU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Monroe, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · LSU. Eric Monroe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.7 disruption score.
Eric Monroe played DB for LSU and Texas Tech. Across 6 tracked seasons, Eric Monroe recorded 163 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Texas Tech.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
LSU paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across LSU, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
31.7
Usage
8.2
Consistency
46.8
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 1. Houston: 1. Unknown: 0. Florida International: 0. Texas: 0.5. West Virginia: 0. TCU: 0. Kansas: 1. Kansas State: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Iowa State: 1. Oklahoma State: 0.5. Baylor: 2.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 3 by 22.5. Houston: 5 by 30.8. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Florida International: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 8 by 38.3. West Virginia: 6 by 25. TCU: 5 by 20.8. Kansas: 3 by 22.5. Kansas State: 11 by 45.8. Oklahoma: 8 by 33.3. Iowa State: 7 by 39.2. Oklahoma State: 8 by 38.3. Baylor: 13 by 75
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
75 vs Baylor
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 34-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Baylor10+ tackles · Splash game | L 24-27 | 13 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/21 | vs Oklahoma State | L 0-23 | 8 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Iowa State | W 41-38 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Oklahoma | L 21-52 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Kansas State10+ tackles | L 24-25 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Kansas | W 41-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs TCU | L 31-52 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ West Virginia | W 23-20 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Texas | L 35-70 | 8 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Florida International | W 54-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Houston | W 38-21 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
LSU
2016-2020
Opening stop
Texas Tech
2020-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | LSU | 2 | 13.1 | 1.7 | 2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | -2 |
| 2019 Postseason | LSU | 1 | 7.8 | 3.2 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | LSU | 1 | 7.8 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 7 | 31.6 | 7.3 | 6 |
| 2020 Regular Season | LSU | 7 | 31.6 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Texas Tech | 7.5 | 31.7 | 8.2 | 0.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 7.5 | 31.7 | 8.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 69.3 takeover score.
#2
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 60.2 takeover score.
#3
Auburn
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · LSU
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
34.9
#2
2021 Postseason · Texas Tech
24
7.5 primary · 31.7 efficiency · 8.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Texas Tech
24
7.5 primary · 31.7 efficiency · 8.2 usage
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9729
North Shore · Houston, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
163
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.