Usage Score
12.7
Player Dossier
2015-2018Illinois
WR • 6'4" • 218 lbs • Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Drake Davis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.7
Efficiency
100
Consistency
52.2
Season Value
65.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · LSU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drake Davis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · LSU. Drake Davis reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Drake Davis played WR for LSU and Illinois. Across 4 tracked seasons, Drake Davis recorded 153 receiving yards, 4 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with LSU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
LSU paired 134 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across LSU, Illinois.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
44.7
Efficiency
100
Usage
12.7
Consistency
52.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 36. Syracuse: 98. Texas A&M: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
LSU
2015-2017
Opening stop
Illinois
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | LSU | 19 | 100 | 12.5 | 19 |
| 2016 Regular Season | LSU | 19 | 100 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | LSU | 134 | 100 | 12.7 | 115 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Illinois | 0 | — | — | -134 |
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98
Primary metric
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
19
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
36
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisville
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · LSU
134 primary output · 100 efficiency · 12.7 usage
65.5
#2
2016 Postseason · LSU
34.3
19 primary · 100 efficiency · 12.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · LSU
34.3
19 primary · 100 efficiency · 12.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7697
Naperville North · Malden, IL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
153
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.