Usage Score
25.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Baylor
Denzel Mims
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Daingerfield, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Denzel Mims reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93
Consistency
77.5
Season Value
72.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Baylor
16161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Denzel Mims, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Baylor. Denzel Mims reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Baylor paired 1,020 primary output with 93 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Baylor
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
78.5
Efficiency
93
Usage
25.5
Consistency
77.5
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 75. Unknown: 46. UTSA: 101. Rice: 102. Iowa State: 106. Kansas State: 83. Texas Tech: 65. Oklahoma State: 16. West Virginia: 99. TCU: 57. Oklahoma: 92. Texas: 125. Kansas: 53
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 5 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 61.3. UTSA: 7 by 96.2. Rice: 6 by 100. Iowa State: 6 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 100. Texas Tech: 3 by 100. Oklahoma State: 1 by 100. West Virginia: 5 by 100. TCU: 6 by 63.3. Oklahoma: 6 by 100. Texas: 7 by 100. Kansas: 4 by 88.3
Split Comparison
Wins80.7 · n=10 · -2.8 vs Losses
Losses83.5 · n=2 · +2.8 vs Wins
First Half82.6 · n=7 · +8.9 vs Second Half
Second Half73.7 · n=6 · -8.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/2 | vs Georgia | L 14-26 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Kansas | W 61-6 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Texas100 receiving yards | W 24-10 | — | 7 | 125 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 1 | 26 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Oklahoma2+ TD | L 31-34 | — | 6 | 92 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ TCU2+ TD | W 29-23 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 2 | 20 |
| Fri 11/1 | vs West Virginia | W 17-14 | — | 5 | 99 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Oklahoma State | W 45-27 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Texas Tech | W 33-30 | — | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Kansas State | W 31-12 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 23-21 | — | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Rice100 receiving yards | W 21-13 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 63-14 | — | 7 | 101 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 3 | 30 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Baylor
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Baylor | 24 | 48.9 | 7.9 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Baylor | 24 | 48.9 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Baylor | 1,087 | 92.3 | 21.2 | 1,063 |
| 2018 Postseason | Baylor | 794 | 85.4 | 18.2 | -293 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Baylor | 794 | 85.4 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Baylor | 1,020 | 93 | 25.5 | 226 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Baylor | 1,020 | 93 | 25.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
192
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
192 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Baylor
1,020 primary output · 93 efficiency · 25.5 usage
72.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Baylor
72.4
1,020 primary · 93 efficiency · 25.5 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Baylor
68.1
1,087 primary · 92.3 efficiency · 21.2 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8792
Daingerfield · Daingerfield, TX
- Committed To
- Baylor
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,925
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.