Player Stats

Kobe Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
97
TFL
21
Sacks
7
QB hurries
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonMississippi State7211--024.9
2017 Regular SeasonMississippi State7152.50--024.9
2018 PostseasonMississippi State1310.50--042.7
2018 Regular SeasonMississippi State1320602-042.7
2019 PostseasonMississippi State1343.52--050.1
2019 Regular SeasonMississippi State13263.522-050.1
2020 Regular SeasonMississippi State1029422-049.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Mississippi State paired 13 primary output with 19.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Alabama

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Mississippi State

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

20.1

Usage

6.2

Consistency

63.5

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 1. Arkansas: 1. Kentucky: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Alabama: 2. Vanderbilt: 1. Georgia: 0.5. Ole Miss: 0.5. Auburn: 0. Missouri: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 3 by 22.5. Arkansas: 3 by 22.5. Kentucky: 2 by 18.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Alabama: 4 by 36.7. Vanderbilt: 3 by 22.5. Georgia: 1 by 9.2. Ole Miss: 5 by 25.8. Auburn: 4 by 16.7. Missouri: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 3 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Wins