Player Stats

Max Richardson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
317
TFL
32.5
Sacks
10
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonBoston College6100.50--07.9
2017 Regular SeasonBoston College4230.50.5-1020.8
2018 Regular SeasonBoston College127792.5-2057.4
2019 Regular SeasonBoston College1210814.53.522078.2
2020 Regular SeasonBoston College119983.511063.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Boston College paired 22 primary output with 54.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 47.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Boston College

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.2

Efficiency

47.9

Usage

12.6

Consistency

45.3

Best Game by takeover score

Syracuse

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 1.5. Texas State: 1. North Carolina: 1. Pittsburgh: 4. Virginia Tech: 0. Georgia Tech: 2. Clemson: 0. Syracuse: 4. Notre Dame: 0. Louisville: 0. Virginia: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 8 by 48.3. Texas State: 8 by 43.3. North Carolina: 13 by 60. Pittsburgh: 9 by 77.5. Virginia Tech: 15 by 50. Georgia Tech: 5 by 40.8. Clemson: 11 by 45.8. Syracuse: 10 by 81.7. Notre Dame: 6 by 25. Louisville: 1 by 4.2. Virginia: 13 by 50

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.1 · Games = 6 · +1.9 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 5 · -1.9 vs Wins