Player Stats

Brandon Barlow College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
84
TFL
12.5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonBoston College11-0--036.4
2018 Regular SeasonBoston College51520--019
2019 PostseasonBoston College132101-050.2
2019 Regular SeasonBoston College13325.52.51-050.2
2020 Regular SeasonBoston College103441.51-037.6
2021 Regular SeasonBoston College00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Boston College paired 11 primary output with 19.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Boston College

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

20.7

Usage

6.9

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 1.5. North Carolina: 3. Pittsburgh: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Clemson: 1. Syracuse: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Louisville: 1. Virginia: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 3 by 27.5. North Carolina: 3 by 42.5. Pittsburgh: 5 by 20.8. Virginia Tech: 3 by 12.5. Georgia Tech: 1 by 4.2. Clemson: 1 by 14.2. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 5 by 20.8. Louisville: 5 by 30.8. Virginia: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.3 vs Wins