Usage Score
4.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019Ole Miss
Myles Hartsfield
DB • 5'11" • 211 lbs • Sayreville, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Myles Hartsfield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.5
Consistency
53.2
Season Value
22
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Myles Hartsfield, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Myles Hartsfield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 7.5 primary output with 20.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
20.5
Usage
4.1
Consistency
53.2
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 1. Arkansas: 0.5. Unknown: 1. California: 2. Alabama: 1. Vanderbilt: 1. Missouri: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Auburn: 0. New Mexico State: 0. LSU: 0. Mississippi State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 2 by 18.3. Arkansas: 6 by 30. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. California: 5 by 40.8. Alabama: 3 by 22.5. Vanderbilt: 3 by 22.5. Missouri: 3 by 22.5. Texas A&M: 5 by 20.8. Auburn: 3 by 12.5. New Mexico State: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 5 by 20.8. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 3 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 8 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · Games = 6 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 6 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs California
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Mississippi State | L 20-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs LSU | L 37-58 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs New Mexico State | W 41-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Auburn | L 14-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Texas A&M | L 17-24 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Missouri | L 27-38 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Vanderbilt | W 31-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Alabama | L 31-59 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs California | L 20-28 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Arkansas | W 31-17 | 6 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Memphis | L 10-15 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 3 | 17.4 | 3.2 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 7 | 20.4 | 4.4 | 4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 8.5 | 21.3 | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 7.5 | 20.5 | 4.1 | -1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#2
California
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#4
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#5
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
7.5 primary output · 20.5 efficiency · 4.1 usage
22
#2
2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
19
8.5 primary · 21.3 efficiency · 2.8 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Ole Miss
12.1
7 primary · 20.4 efficiency · 4.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9939
Southeast Polk · Des Moines, IA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
167
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.