Player Stats

Josiah Sa'o College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
19
TFL
1.5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonVanderbilt11-0--037
2018 Regular SeasonVanderbilt22-0--036.5
2019 Regular SeasonVanderbilt13-0--045
2020 Regular SeasonCharlotte57-0--038.7
2021 Regular SeasonCharlotte561.50--037.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Vanderbilt paired 0 primary output with 12.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Vanderbilt, Charlotte.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Illinois

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Charlotte

Games

5

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

8

Usage

3.3

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 0. Gardner-Webb: 0.5. Georgia State: 0. Illinois: 1. Florida International: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 1 by 4.2. Gardner-Webb: 1 by 9.2. Georgia State: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 2 by 18.3. Florida International: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · +0.3 vs Wins