Player Stats

Andre Mintze College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
75
TFL
16.5
Sacks
9
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonVanderbilt4510.5--022.5
2018 PostseasonVanderbilt8111--023.3
2018 Regular SeasonVanderbilt892.50--023.3
2019 Regular SeasonVanderbilt12396.54.53-060.7
2020 Regular SeasonVanderbilt9215.5321056.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Vanderbilt paired 14 primary output with 25.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 22.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Vanderbilt

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

22.5

Usage

9

Consistency

46

Best Game by takeover score

Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 1. LSU: 1. South Carolina: 2. Ole Miss: 0. Mississippi State: 2. Kentucky: 0. Florida: 2.5. Missouri: 0. Tennessee: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 18.3. LSU: 1 by 14.2. South Carolina: 2 by 28.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 8.3. Mississippi State: 2 by 28.3. Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Florida: 7 by 54.2. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 3 by 42.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half1.2 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · Games = 4 · +0.2 vs First Half