Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2017-2019Texas A&M
Kendrick Rogers
WR • 6'4" • 204 lbs • Frankston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kendrick Rogers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74
Consistency
65.6
Season Value
63.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
1717181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendrick Rogers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Kendrick Rogers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 351 primary output with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
39
Efficiency
74
Usage
14.7
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 12. Clemson: 60. Unknown: 83. Auburn: 45. Alabama: 5. Ole Miss: 23. Mississippi State: 44. UTSA: 31. Georgia: 48
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 1 by 80. Clemson: 6 by 66.7. Unknown: 6 by 92.2. Auburn: 4 by 75. Alabama: 1 by 33.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 76.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 73.3. UTSA: 3 by 68.9. Georgia: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins27.5 · n=4 · -12 vs Losses
Losses39.5 · n=4 · +12 vs Wins
First Half41 · n=5 · +4.5 vs Second Half
Second Half36.5 · n=4 · -4.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | @ Georgia | L 13-19 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Mississippi State | W 49-30 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Alabama | L 28-47 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Auburn | L 20-28 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Clemson | L 10-24 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Texas State | W 41-7 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 99 | 60.1 | 7.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 99 | 60.1 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 336 | 72.1 | 15.9 | 237 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 336 | 72.1 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 351 | 74 | 14.7 | 15 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
83
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
48
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
351 primary output · 74 efficiency · 14.7 usage
63.3
#2
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
58.6
336 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
58.6
336 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8761
Frankston · Frankston, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
786
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.