Usage Score
11.2
Player Dossier
2017-2019Texas A&M
Justin Madubuike
DL • 6'3" • 304 lbs • Mckinney, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Justin Madubuike shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.3
Consistency
39.1
Season Value
31.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
1717181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Madubuike, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M. Justin Madubuike shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 18 primary output with 28.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
32.3
Usage
11.2
Consistency
39.1
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 1. Clemson: 1. Unknown: 1. Auburn: 3. Arkansas: 5. Alabama: 0.5. Ole Miss: 1.5. Mississippi State: 0. UTSA: 2. South Carolina: 0.5. Georgia: 1. LSU: 3.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 3 by 22.5. Clemson: 2 by 18.3. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. Auburn: 4 by 46.7. Arkansas: 5 by 70.8. Alabama: 6 by 30. Ole Miss: 5 by 35.8. Mississippi State: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 4 by 21.7. Georgia: 3 by 22.5. LSU: 5 by 55.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=6 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · n=5 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half1.9 · n=6 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | @ LSUSplash game | L 7-50 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Georgia | L 13-19 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs South Carolina | W 30-6 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Mississippi State | W 49-30 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Alabama | L 28-47 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ ArkansasSplash game | W 31-27 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs AuburnSplash game | L 20-28 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Clemson | L 10-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Texas State | W 41-7 | 3 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 2.5 | 10.8 | 3.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 2.5 | 10.8 | 3.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 18 | 28.9 | 8.5 | 15.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 18 | 28.9 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 20 | 32.3 | 11.2 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.6 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#3
Kentucky
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#4
NC State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
#5
LSU
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
18 primary output · 28.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
33.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
33.1
18 primary · 28.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
31.5
20 primary · 32.3 efficiency · 11.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
6
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9726
McKinney North · McKinney, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
105
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.