Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2016-2018Texas A&M
Tyrel Dodson
LB • 6'2" • 242 lbs • Franklin, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tyrel Dodson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.2
Consistency
60.4
Season Value
27.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyrel Dodson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Texas A&M. Tyrel Dodson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 26.5 primary output with 51.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
29.2
Usage
7.7
Consistency
60.4
Best Game by takeover score
NC State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 1. Unknown: 1. Clemson: 1.5. UL Monroe: 1. Alabama: 0. Arkansas: 0. Kentucky: 2. South Carolina: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Auburn: 1. Ole Miss: 1.5. UAB: 2. LSU: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 26.7. Clemson: 7 by 44.2. UL Monroe: 4 by 26.7. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Arkansas: 3 by 12.5. Kentucky: 4 by 36.7. South Carolina: 3 by 12.5. Mississippi State: 8 by 33.3. Auburn: 3 by 22.5. Ole Miss: 6 by 40. UAB: 9 by 57.5. LSU: 6 by 30
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=8 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · n=4 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=6 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs NC State | W 52-13 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | vs LSU | W 74-72 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs UAB | W 41-20 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-24 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Auburn | L 24-28 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Mississippi State | L 13-28 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ South Carolina | W 26-23 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Kentucky | W 20-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Arkansas | W 24-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Alabama | L 23-45 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs UL Monroe | W 48-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Clemson | L 26-28 | 7 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1.5 | 12.7 | 2.2 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1.5 | 12.7 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 26.5 | 51.8 | 12.3 | 25 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 26.5 | 51.8 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 11.5 | 29.2 | 7.7 | -15 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 11.5 | 29.2 | 7.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.7 takeover score.
#2
Alabama
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#3
LSU
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.7 takeover score.
#4
UAB
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#5
Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
26.5 primary output · 51.8 efficiency · 12.3 usage
39.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Texas A&M
39.3
26.5 primary · 51.8 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
27.2
11.5 primary · 29.2 efficiency · 7.7 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8824
Centennial · Franklin, TN
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
192
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.