Usage Score
2.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Texas A&M
Charles Oliver
DB • 6'2" • 196 lbs • Fairfield, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Charles Oliver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.6
Consistency
35
Season Value
28.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
1616171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Charles Oliver, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M. Charles Oliver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.6 disruption score.
Charles Oliver played DB for Texas A&M. Across 4 tracked seasons, Charles Oliver recorded 92 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Texas A&M.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 13 primary output with 23.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
24.6
Usage
2.8
Consistency
35
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 1. Texas State: 0. Clemson: 0. Unknown: 1. Auburn: 2. Arkansas: 2. Alabama: 0. UTSA: 1. South Carolina: 6. Georgia: 1. LSU: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 14.2. Texas State: 1 by 4.2. Clemson: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Auburn: 4 by 36.7. Arkansas: 2 by 28.3. Alabama: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 1 by 14.2. South Carolina: 3 by 62.5. Georgia: 3 by 22.5. LSU: 7 by 49.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2 · Games = 5 · +1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -1 vs Wins
First Half1 · Games = 6 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half2 · Games = 5 · +1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Oklahoma State | W 24-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | @ LSU | L 7-50 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Georgia | L 13-19 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs South Carolina | W 30-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 6 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Alabama | L 28-47 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas | W 31-27 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Auburn | L 20-28 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Clemson | L 10-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Texas State | W 41-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 4 | 24.5 | 3.5 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4 | 24.5 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 10 | 20 | 2.9 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 10 | 20 | 2.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 13 | 23.6 | 6.2 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 13 | 23.6 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 16 | 24.6 | 2.8 | 3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 16 | 24.6 | 2.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#2
UCLA
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#3
UAB
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51 takeover score.
#4
Kansas State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
13 primary output · 23.6 efficiency · 6.2 usage
34.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
34.2
13 primary · 23.6 efficiency · 6.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Texas A&M
30.7
10 primary · 20 efficiency · 2.9 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.908
Fairfield · Fairfield, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
92
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.