Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2017-2019Texas A&M
Quartney Davis
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Quartney Davis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.2
Consistency
80.3
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
1718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quartney Davis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Texas A&M. Quartney Davis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 616 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
56
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
24.3
Consistency
80.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 48. Texas State: 85. Clemson: 59. Auburn: 82. Arkansas: 62. Alabama: 81. Ole Miss: 15. Mississippi State: 57. South Carolina: 48. Georgia: 64. LSU: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 6 by 53.3. Texas State: 6 by 94.4. Clemson: 5 by 78.7. Auburn: 5 by 100. Arkansas: 7 by 59. Alabama: 7 by 77.1. Ole Miss: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 76. South Carolina: 5 by 64. Georgia: 5 by 85.3. LSU: 2 by 50
Split Comparison
Wins52.5 · n=6 · -7.7 vs Losses
Losses60.2 · n=5 · +7.7 vs Wins
First Half69.5 · n=6 · +29.7 vs Second Half
Second Half39.8 · n=5 · -29.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Oklahoma State | W 24-21 | — | 6 | 48 | 7.4 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ LSU | L 7-50 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Georgia | L 13-19 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs South Carolina | W 30-6 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Mississippi State | W 49-30 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ole Miss | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Alabama | L 28-47 | — | 7 | 81 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas2+ TD | W 31-27 | — | 7 | 62 | 9 | 8.90 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Auburn | L 20-28 | — | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Clemson | L 10-24 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Texas State | W 41-7 | — | 6 | 85 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 1 | 29 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 585 | 77.6 | 18.3 | 585 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 585 | 77.6 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 616 | 76.2 | 24.3 | 31 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 616 | 76.2 | 24.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 94.1 efficiency score.
#2
Texas State
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#5
Alabama
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 77.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Texas A&M
616 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 24.3 usage
70.2
#2
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
70.2
616 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
62.4
585 primary · 77.6 efficiency · 18.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9422
Langham Creek · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,201
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.