Usage Score
5.4
Player Dossier
2015-2019Tennessee
Marquill Osborne
DB • 5'11" • 192 lbs • Cornelius, NC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Marquill Osborne shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
23.2
Consistency
77.6
Season Value
35.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
15161617181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tennessee • Charlotte
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marquill Osborne, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tennessee. Marquill Osborne shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 0 primary output with 5.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 23.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Charlotte.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Charlotte
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
23.2
Usage
5.4
Consistency
77.6
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 1. Unknown: 1. App State: 0. Massachusetts: 1. Clemson: 1. Florida Atlantic: 1. Florida International: 1. Western Kentucky: 0.5. North Texas: 2. Middle Tennessee: 2. UTEP: 1. Marshall: 1. Old Dominion: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 3 by 22.5. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. App State: 6 by 25. Massachusetts: 1 by 14.2. Clemson: 3 by 22.5. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 22.5. Florida International: 4 by 26.7. Western Kentucky: 4 by 21.7. North Texas: 2 by 28.3. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 36.7. UTEP: 3 by 22.5. Marshall: 1 by 14.2. Old Dominion: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=6 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=6 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/20 | vs Buffalo | L 9-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Old Dominion | W 38-22 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Marshall | W 24-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ UTEP | W 28-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 34-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs North Texas | W 39-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Western Kentucky | L 14-30 | 4 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Florida International | L 23-48 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 27-45 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Clemson | L 10-52 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Massachusetts | W 52-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ App State | L 41-56 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2015-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Charlotte
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Tennessee | 3 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 3 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tennessee | 3 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | 5.2 | 0.9 | -3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tennessee | 4 | 14.7 | 2.5 | 4 |
| 2019 Postseason | Charlotte | 13.5 | 23.2 | 5.4 | 9.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Charlotte | 13.5 | 23.2 | 5.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#2
Kentucky
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45.7 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.6 takeover score.
#4
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#5
Clemson
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 30.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
0 primary output · 5.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35.4
#2
2019 Postseason · Charlotte
35.4
13.5 primary · 23.2 efficiency · 5.4 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Charlotte
35.4
13.5 primary · 23.2 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9241
Hough · Cornelius, NC
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
59
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.