Player Stats

David Marshall College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
68
TFL
8.5
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonGeorgia102-0-1061.7
2016 Regular SeasonGeorgia10243.52.521061.7
2017 PostseasonGeorgia11711--031.2
2017 Regular SeasonGeorgia11161.5021031.2
2018 Regular SeasonGeorgia4610-1026.4
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia10131.50--010.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Georgia paired 10 primary output with 20.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 6.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Auburn

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Georgia

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.1

Efficiency

6.9

Usage

1.7

Consistency

6.7

Best Game by takeover score

Auburn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 0. Murray State: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Tennessee: 0.5. South Carolina: 0. Kentucky: 0. Auburn: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. LSU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 2 by 8.3. Murray State: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 1 by 9.2. South Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 1 by 14.2. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Georgia Tech: 1 by 4.2. LSU: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 8 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -0.2 vs Wins