Player Stats

Antonneous Clayton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
20
TFL
3.5
Sacks
3
QB hurries
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonFlorida43-03-034.7
2017 Regular SeasonFlorida4711--024.6
2018 Regular SeasonFlorida21-01-023.6
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech492.52--045.1
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Georgia Tech paired 4.5 primary output with 20.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Georgia Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisville

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Georgia Tech

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

20.6

Usage

6.2

Consistency

8.3

Best Game by takeover score

Louisville

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 0. Louisville: 4.5. Clemson: 0. Boston College: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. Louisville: 5 by 65.8. Clemson: 1 by 4.2. Boston College: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4.5 · Games = 1 · +4.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -4.5 vs Wins