Player Stats

JoJo Domann College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
208
TFL
27
Sacks
5.5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonNebraska72-0--037.4
2016 Regular SeasonNebraska76-0--037.4
2017 Regular SeasonNebraska00-0--0-
2018 Regular SeasonNebraska61911-2026.1
2019 Regular SeasonNebraska125210.52.516065.5
2020 Regular SeasonNebraska8586.5015062.8
2021 Regular SeasonNebraska10719223070

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Nebraska paired 18 primary output with 47.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 47.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State

Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Nebraska

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

47.2

Usage

11.8

Consistency

44.9

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Fordham: 2. Illinois: 0. Buffalo: 2. Oklahoma: 2. Michigan State: 1. Northwestern: 5. Michigan: 0. Minnesota: 1. Purdue: 0. Ohio State: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fordham: 5 by 40.8. Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Buffalo: 5 by 40.8. Oklahoma: 12 by 70. Michigan State: 4 by 26.7. Northwestern: 9 by 87.5. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Minnesota: 8 by 43.3. Purdue: 13 by 50. Ohio State: 9 by 87.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3 · Games = 3 · +1.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 7 · -1.7 vs Wins