Usage Score
5.7
Player Dossier
2021-2021Kansas State
Reginald Stubblefield
DB • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Krum, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Reginald Stubblefield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.1
Consistency
55.2
Season Value
27.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Kansas State
2121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Kansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Reginald Stubblefield, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Kansas State. Reginald Stubblefield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.1 disruption score.
Reginald Stubblefield played DB for Kansas State. Across 1 tracked season, Reginald Stubblefield recorded 34 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Kansas State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Kansas State paired 10 primary output with 20.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Kansas State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
20.1
Usage
5.7
Consistency
55.2
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Stanford: 1. Unknown: 0. Nevada: 2. Oklahoma: 0. Iowa State: 0. Texas Tech: 1. TCU: 1. Kansas: 1. West Virginia: 1. Baylor: 0.5. Texas: 2.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 2 by 8.3. Stanford: 0 by 10. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Nevada: 3 by 32.5. Oklahoma: 2 by 8.3. Iowa State: 4 by 16.7. Texas Tech: 4 by 26.7. TCU: 2 by 18.3. Kansas: 3 by 22.5. West Virginia: 3 by 22.5. Baylor: 4 by 21.7. Texas: 5 by 45.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 7 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 4 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · Games = 6 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/5 | vs LSU | W 42-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/26 | @ TexasSplash game | L 17-22 | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Baylor | L 10-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs West Virginia | W 34-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Kansas | W 35-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs TCU | W 31-12 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Texas Tech | W 25-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Iowa State | L 20-33 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Oklahoma | L 31-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Nevada | W 38-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Stanford | W 24-7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas State
2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Kansas State | 10 | 20.1 | 5.7 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kansas State | 10 | 20.1 | 5.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 72.5 takeover score.
#2
Texas
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.1 takeover score.
#3
UNLV
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#4
Nevada
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.2 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Kansas State
10 primary output · 20.1 efficiency · 5.7 usage
27.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · Kansas State
27.8
10 primary · 20.1 efficiency · 5.7 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7756
Sam Houston · Arlington, TX
- Committed To
- Prairie View A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
34
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.