Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2015-2018Air Force
WR • 5'8" • 170 lbs • Gainsville, GA, USA
Andrew Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.8
Efficiency
95.8
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
55.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Air Force
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Air Force. Andrew Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Air Force paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 95.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
11.5
Efficiency
95.8
Usage
18.8
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Florida Atlantic: 15. Utah State: 0. Nevada: 29. Navy: 0. San Diego State: 0. Boise State: 57. Army: 0. New Mexico: 0. Wyoming: 0. Colorado State: 25
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. Nevada: 1 by 100. Boise State: 3 by 100. Colorado State: 2 by 83.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boise State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boise State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 11/22 | vs Colorado State | W 27-19 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Wyoming | L 27-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs New Mexico | W 42-24 | — | — | — | 13 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Army | L 14-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Boise State | L 38-48 | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ San Diego State | L 17-21 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Navy | W 35-7 | — | — | — | 51 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Nevada | L 25-28 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Utah State | L 32-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 26-33 | — | 1 | 15 | 7 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Air Force
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Air Force | 6 | 40 | 25 | 6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Air Force | 126 | 95.8 | 18.8 | 120 |
#1 Featured game
Boise State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nevada
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#3
Nevada
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Colorado State
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Air Force
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2018 Regular Season · Air Force
55.7
126 primary · 95.8 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Air Force
20.2
6 primary · 40 efficiency · 25 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7656
North Hall · Gainesville, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
132
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Andrew Smith quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit