Player Stats

Randy Allen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
73
TFL
19.5
Sacks
12
QB hurries
8
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonSouth Alabama13911--074.6
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama136418.51182074.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

South Alabama paired 41.5 primary output with 50.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 50.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · South Alabama

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

3.2

Efficiency

50.8

Usage

16.2

Consistency

47.6

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 2. Mississippi State: 1.5. Georgia Southern: 3. Louisiana: 2.5. Nicholls: 6. San Diego State: 5. Arkansas State: 6.5. Troy: 2.5. Georgia State: 2.5. UL Monroe: 2. Presbyterian: 0. Idaho: 0. New Mexico State: 8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 9 by 57.5. Mississippi State: 5 by 35.8. Georgia Southern: 5 by 50.8. Louisiana: 4 by 41.7. Nicholls: 6 by 75. San Diego State: 3 by 62.5. Arkansas State: 13 by 100. Troy: 4 by 41.7. Georgia State: 5 by 45.8. UL Monroe: 8 by 53.3. Presbyterian: 2 by 8.3. Idaho: 3 by 12.5. New Mexico State: 6 by 75

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.8 · Games = 6 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses2.6 · Games = 7 · -1.2 vs Wins