Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Toledo
LB • 6'3" • 230 lbs • Leesburg, VA, USA
Jordan Fisher shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.9
Efficiency
38
Consistency
50.8
Season Value
25.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Fisher, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo. Jordan Fisher shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38 disruption score.
Jordan Fisher played LB for Toledo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jordan Fisher recorded 295 receiving yards and 149 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Toledo paired 0 primary output with 0.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 38 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
38
Usage
8.9
Consistency
50.8
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 0. Unknown: 1. Colorado State: 1. BYU: 0.5. Western Michigan: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Ball State: 1. Eastern Michigan: 1.5. Kent State: 1.5. Northern Illinois: 0. Buffalo: 2. Central Michigan: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 8 by 43.3. Colorado State: 10 by 51.7. BYU: 9 by 42.5. Western Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Bowling Green: 6 by 25. Ball State: 7 by 39.2. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 44.2. Kent State: 11 by 60.8. Northern Illinois: 9 by 37.5. Buffalo: 7 by 49.2. Central Michigan: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Central Michigan | L 7-49 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/21 | @ BuffaloSplash game | L 30-49 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/14 | vs Northern Illinois | L 28-31 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/6 | vs Kent State10+ tackles | W 35-33 | 11 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 37-34 | 7 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ball State | L 14-52 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Bowling Green | L 7-20 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Western Michigan | W 31-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs BYU | W 28-21 | 9 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Colorado State10+ tackles | W 41-35 | 10 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Kentucky | L 24-38 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 6 | 25.5 | 5.3 | 6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 6 | 25.5 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 8.5 | 38 | 8.9 | 2.5 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#2
Northern Illinois
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#3
Kent State
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 43.5 takeover score.
#5
Ball State
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 41.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Toledo
0 primary output · 0.5 efficiency · 0.1 usage
33.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
33.5
0 primary · 0.5 efficiency · 0.1 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
33.3
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7844
Tuscarora · Leesburg, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
149
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.