Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2016-2021Toledo
Danzel McKinley-Lewis
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Danzel McKinley-Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.1
Consistency
29.6
Season Value
37.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Toledo
1617171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Danzel McKinley-Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Toledo. Danzel McKinley-Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Toledo paired 615 primary output with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Toledo
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
23
Efficiency
73.1
Usage
11
Consistency
29.6
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 6. Unknown: 11. Colorado State: 44. Ball State: 13. Massachusetts: 15. Northern Illinois: 14. Western Michigan: 34. Eastern Michigan: 10. Bowling Green: 83. Ohio: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 20. Unknown: 2 by 36.7. Colorado State: 3 by 97.8. Ball State: 2 by 43.3. Massachusetts: 1 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 93.3. Western Michigan: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 66.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins29 · n=5 · +10.5 vs Losses
Losses18.5 · n=4 · -10.5 vs Wins
First Half17.8 · n=5 · -10.4 vs Second Half
Second Half28.2 · n=5 · +10.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/17 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 24-31 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Wed 11/17 | @ Ohio | W 35-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/11 | @ Bowling Green | W 49-17 | — | 3 | 83 | 27.7 | 27.70 | 1 | 59 |
| Tue 11/2 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 49-52 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Western Michigan | W 34-15 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Northern Illinois | L 20-22 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Massachusetts | W 45-7 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Ball State | W 22-12 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Colorado State | L 6-22 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2016-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 70 | 49.4 | 5.3 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 319 | 68 | 10 | 249 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 319 | 68 | 10 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 4 | 26.7 | 6.3 | -315 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 615 | 81 | 20.1 | 611 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Toledo | 280 | 67.1 | 13.1 | -335 |
| 2021 Postseason | Toledo | 230 | 73.1 | 11 | -50 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 230 | 73.1 | 11 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88
Primary metric
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
90
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Toledo
615 primary output · 81 efficiency · 20.1 usage
67
#2
2020 Regular Season · Toledo
43.4
280 primary · 67.1 efficiency · 13.1 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Toledo
40.7
319 primary · 68 efficiency · 10 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7833
Seton LaSalle · Pittsburgh, PA
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,518
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.