Player Stats

Dexter Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,798
Rushing yards
1,636
Receiving yards
162
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 PostseasonNotre Dame6220018.3
2015 Regular SeasonNotre Dame679790118.3
2016 Regular SeasonNotre Dame1121620016326.2
2017 PostseasonNotre Dame936360045.6
2017 Regular SeasonNotre Dame933732413545.6
2018 PostseasonNotre Dame9835429080.5
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame91,0459411041380.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 1,128 primary output with 61.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 61.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

125.3

Efficiency

61.6

Usage

31.5

Consistency

70.4

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 83. Stanford: 160. Virginia Tech: 178. Pittsburgh: 33. Navy: 169. Northwestern: 69. Florida State: 202. Syracuse: 83. USC: 151

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 19 by 39.3. Stanford: 22 by 78.2. Virginia Tech: 17 by 93.6. Pittsburgh: 15 by 24.1. Navy: 26 by 65.7. Northwestern: 20 by 32.8. Florida State: 20 by 92.1. Syracuse: 14 by 60.3. USC: 21 by 67.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins130.6 · Games = 8 · +47.6 vs Losses
Losses83 · Games = 1 · -47.6 vs Wins