Usage / Role
13%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2017Notre Dame
WR • 6'5" • 203 lbs • Anaheim, CA, USA
Equanimeous St. Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
13%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
34
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
40
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Player Story
Equanimeous St. Brown built his college career from 2015 through 2017 as a wide receiver from Anaheim, CA wearing No. 6, spending time with Notre Dame. The clearest part of Equanimeous St. Brown's career was his...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Equanimeous St. Brown, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Equanimeous St. Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 30.7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 58 | 961 | 9 | 87.3 |
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 12 | 2 | 47 | 0 | 65.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 31 | 468 | 4 | 65.2 |
Related Context
Equanimeous St. Brown played WR for Notre Dame. Across 3 tracked seasons, Equanimeous St. Brown recorded 1,484 receiving yards and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 961 primary output with 89.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
42.9
Efficiency
77.9
Usage
21.2
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 47. Temple: 80. Georgia: 16. Boston College: 3. Michigan State: 61. Miami (OH): 42. North Carolina: 9. USC: 29. NC State: 13. Wake Forest: 36. Miami: 68. Stanford: 111
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 2 by 100. Temple: 4 by 100. Georgia: 2 by 53.3. Boston College: 1 by 20. Michigan State: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 93.3. North Carolina: 1 by 60. USC: 3 by 64.4. NC State: 2 by 43.3. Wake Forest: 2 by 100. Miami: 4 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | @ LSU | W 21-17 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 11/26 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards | L 20-38 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 1 | 75 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Miami | L 8-41 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Wake Forest | W 48-37 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs NC State | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs USC | W 49-14 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ North Carolina | W 33-10 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Miami (OH) | W 52-17 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 38-18 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Boston College | W 49-20 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Georgia | L 19-20 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Temple | W 49-16 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 34 |
Player Story
Equanimeous St. Brown built his college career from 2015 through 2017 as a wide receiver from Anaheim, CA wearing No. 6, spending time with Notre Dame. The clearest part of Equanimeous St. Brown's career was his receiving role: 92 catches, 1,484 receiving yards, and 13 touchdowns across 26 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Notre Dame. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 18 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 26 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Notre Dame.
The arc is straightforward: Equanimeous St. Brown moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 8 | 53.3 | 5.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 961 | 89.4 | 26.3 | 953 |
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 515 | 77.9 | 21.2 | -446 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 515 | 77.9 | 21.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Stanford
Week 13 · L 20-38
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Miami
Week 11 · L 8-41
68
Receiving Yards
87.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Syracuse
Week 5 · W 50-33
182
Receiving Yards
86 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
182 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Duke
Week 4 · L 35-38
116
Receiving Yards
84.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Temple
Week 1 · W 49-16
80
Receiving Yards
83.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
961 primary output · 89.4 efficiency · 26.3 usage
87.3
#2
2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
65.2
515 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Notre Dame
65.2
515 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 21.2 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.