Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 961 primary output with 89.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Equanimeous St. Brown College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 1,484
- Receptions
- 92
- Touchdowns
- 13
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 30.7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 58 | 961 | 9 | 87.3 |
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 12 | 2 | 47 | 0 | 65.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 31 | 468 | 4 | 65.2 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
42.9
Efficiency
77.9
Usage
21.2
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 47. Temple: 80. Georgia: 16. Boston College: 3. Michigan State: 61. Miami (OH): 42. North Carolina: 9. USC: 29. NC State: 13. Wake Forest: 36. Miami: 68. Stanford: 111
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 2 by 100. Temple: 4 by 100. Georgia: 2 by 53.3. Boston College: 1 by 20. Michigan State: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 93.3. North Carolina: 1 by 60. USC: 3 by 64.4. NC State: 2 by 43.3. Wake Forest: 2 by 100. Miami: 4 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins35.6 · Games = 9 · -29.4 vs Losses
Losses65 · Games = 3 · +29.4 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Equanimeous St. Brown
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.