Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2015-2017Notre Dame
Equanimeous St. Brown
WR • 6'5" • 203 lbs • Anaheim, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Equanimeous St. Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.9
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
52.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
15161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Equanimeous St. Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Equanimeous St. Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 961 primary output with 89.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
42.9
Efficiency
77.9
Usage
21.2
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 47. Temple: 80. Georgia: 16. Boston College: 3. Michigan State: 61. Miami (OH): 42. North Carolina: 9. USC: 29. NC State: 13. Wake Forest: 36. Miami: 68. Stanford: 111
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 2 by 100. Temple: 4 by 100. Georgia: 2 by 53.3. Boston College: 1 by 20. Michigan State: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 93.3. North Carolina: 1 by 60. USC: 3 by 64.4. NC State: 2 by 43.3. Wake Forest: 2 by 100. Miami: 4 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins35.6 · n=9 · -29.4 vs Losses
Losses65 · n=3 · +29.4 vs Wins
First Half41.5 · n=6 · -2.8 vs Second Half
Second Half44.3 · n=6 · +2.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | @ LSU | W 21-17 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 11/26 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards | L 20-38 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 1 | 75 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Miami | L 8-41 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Wake Forest | W 48-37 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs NC State | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs USC | W 49-14 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ North Carolina | W 33-10 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Miami (OH) | W 52-17 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 38-18 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Boston College | W 49-20 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Georgia | L 19-20 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Temple | W 49-16 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 8 | 53.3 | 5.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 961 | 89.4 | 26.3 | 953 |
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 515 | 77.9 | 21.2 | -446 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 515 | 77.9 | 21.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Syracuse
182
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
182 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
961 primary output · 89.4 efficiency · 26.3 usage
71.7
#2
2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
52.7
515 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Notre Dame
52.7
515 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 21.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9298
Servite · Anaheim, CA
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,484
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.