Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Notre Dame
TE • 6'4" • 244 lbs • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Alize Mack reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.6
Efficiency
67.7
Consistency
69.2
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alize Mack, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Notre Dame. Alize Mack reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Alize Mack played TE for Notre Dame. Across 4 tracked seasons, Alize Mack recorded 716 receiving yards and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 360 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
30
Efficiency
67.7
Usage
14.6
Consistency
69.2
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 11. Michigan: 26. Ball State: 23. Vanderbilt: 25. Wake Forest: 61. Stanford: 35. Virginia Tech: 39. Pittsburgh: 31. Navy: 10. Florida State: 29. Syracuse: 55. USC: 15
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 36.7. Michigan: 1 by 100. Ball State: 2 by 76.7. Vanderbilt: 3 by 55.6. Wake Forest: 6 by 67.8. Stanford: 1 by 100. Virginia Tech: 6 by 43.3. Pittsburgh: 6 by 34.4. Navy: 2 by 33.3. Florida State: 3 by 64.4. Syracuse: 3 by 100. USC: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | @ Clemson | L 3-30 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ USC | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Syracuse | W 36-3 | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Florida State2+ TD | W 42-13 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 2 | 15 |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Navy | W 44-22 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Pittsburgh | W 19-14 | — | 6 | 31 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ Virginia Tech | W 45-23 | — | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Stanford | W 38-17 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Wake Forest | W 56-27 | — | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Vanderbilt | W 22-17 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Ball State | W 24-16 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Michigan | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Notre Dame | 190 | 73.7 | 11.3 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 190 | 73.7 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | -190 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 166 | 57.7 | 22.1 | 166 |
| 2018 Postseason | Notre Dame | 360 | 67.7 | 14.6 | 194 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 360 | 67.7 | 14.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56
Primary metric
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 57.3 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 67.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
360 primary output · 67.7 efficiency · 14.6 usage
62.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · Notre Dame
62.9
360 primary · 67.7 efficiency · 14.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
50.9
190 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 11.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9693
Bishop Gorman · Las Vegas, NV
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
716
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.