Player Dossier

2015-2018

Notre Dame

Alize Mack

TE • 6'4" • 244 lbs • Las Vegas, NV, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Alize Mack reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

14.6

Efficiency

67.7

Consistency

69.2

Season Value

62.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Notre Dame

151516171818

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Notre Dame
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Alize Mack, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Notre Dame. Alize Mack reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Alize Mack played TE for Notre Dame. Across 4 tracked seasons, Alize Mack recorded 716 receiving yards and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Notre Dame.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 360 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 67.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

30

Efficiency

67.7

Usage

14.6

Consistency

69.2

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 11. Michigan: 26. Ball State: 23. Vanderbilt: 25. Wake Forest: 61. Stanford: 35. Virginia Tech: 39. Pittsburgh: 31. Navy: 10. Florida State: 29. Syracuse: 55. USC: 15

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 36.7. Michigan: 1 by 100. Ball State: 2 by 76.7. Vanderbilt: 3 by 55.6. Wake Forest: 6 by 67.8. Stanford: 1 by 100. Virginia Tech: 6 by 43.3. Pittsburgh: 6 by 34.4. Navy: 2 by 33.3. Florida State: 3 by 64.4. Syracuse: 3 by 100. USC: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins31.7 · Games = 11
First Half30.2 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half29.8 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games30 · Games = 12

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Syracuse

Best efficiency game

100 vs USC

Result
Sat 12/29@ ClemsonL 3-302115.55.5008
Sun 11/25@ USCW 24-171151515015
Sat 11/17vs SyracuseW 36-335518.318.30047
Sun 11/11vs Florida State2+ TDW 42-133299.79.70215
Sun 10/28@ NavyW 44-222105508
Sat 10/13vs PittsburghW 19-146315.25.2009
Sun 10/7@ Virginia TechW 45-236396.56.50016
Sat 9/29vs StanfordW 38-171353535135
Sat 9/22@ Wake ForestW 56-2766110.210.20024
Sat 9/15vs VanderbiltW 22-173258.38.30010
Sat 9/8vs Ball StateW 24-1622311.511.50018
Sat 9/1vs MichiganW 24-171262626026

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Notre Dame

    2015-2018

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201520152016201720182018
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2015 PostseasonNotre Dame19073.711.3
2015 Regular SeasonNotre Dame19073.711.30
2016 Regular SeasonNotre Dame0-190
2017 Regular SeasonNotre Dame16657.722.1166
2018 PostseasonNotre Dame36067.714.6194
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame36067.714.60

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Massachusetts

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

56

Primary metric

56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Georgia

41

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Syracuse

55

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Boston College

43

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

43 receiving yards with a 57.3 efficiency score.

#5

Wake Forest

61

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

61 receiving yards with a 67.8 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2018 Postseason · Notre Dame

360 primary output · 67.7 efficiency · 14.6 usage

62.9

#2

2018 Regular Season · Notre Dame

62.9

360 primary · 67.7 efficiency · 14.6 usage

#3

2015 Postseason · Notre Dame

50.9

190 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 11.3 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2015 · Rating 0.9693

Bishop Gorman · Las Vegas, NV

Committed To
Notre Dame
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2015

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

716

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.