Usage Score
21.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Notre Dame
Miles Boykin
WR • 6'4" • 227 lbs • Tinley Park, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Miles Boykin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.1
Consistency
69.7
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Miles Boykin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Notre Dame. Miles Boykin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 872 primary output with 86.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
67.1
Efficiency
86.1
Usage
21.9
Consistency
69.7
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 69. Michigan: 28. Ball State: 119. Vanderbilt: 14. Wake Forest: 6. Stanford: 144. Virginia Tech: 117. Pittsburgh: 84. Navy: 58. Northwestern: 54. Florida State: 30. Syracuse: 76. USC: 73
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 5 by 92. Michigan: 1 by 100. Ball State: 6 by 100. Vanderbilt: 1 by 93.3. Wake Forest: 1 by 40. Stanford: 11 by 87.3. Virginia Tech: 8 by 97.5. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100. Navy: 4 by 96.7. Northwestern: 4 by 90. Florida State: 4 by 50. Syracuse: 7 by 72.4. USC: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins66.9 · n=12
First Half71 · n=7 · +8.5 vs Second Half
Second Half62.5 · n=6 · -8.5 vs First Half
All Games67.1 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | @ Clemson | L 3-30 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ USC | W 24-17 | — | 3 | 73 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Syracuse | W 36-3 | — | 7 | 76 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Florida State | W 42-13 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Northwestern | W 31-21 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Navy2+ TD | W 44-22 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Pittsburgh | W 19-14 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 35 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ Virginia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-23 | — | 8 | 117 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Stanford100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-17 | — | 11 | 144 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Wake Forest | W 56-27 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Vanderbilt | W 22-17 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards | W 24-16 | — | 6 | 119 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Michigan | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 81 | 69.3 | 5.7 | 81 |
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 253 | 83.8 | 12.2 | 172 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 253 | 83.8 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Notre Dame | 872 | 86.1 | 21.9 | 619 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 872 | 86.1 | 21.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144
Primary metric
144 receiving yards with a 87.3 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia Tech
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.
#5
Syracuse
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
872 primary output · 86.1 efficiency · 21.9 usage
69.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Notre Dame
69.4
872 primary · 86.1 efficiency · 21.9 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
41.4
253 primary · 83.8 efficiency · 12.2 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9209
Providence Catholic · New Lenox, IL
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,206
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.