Player Stats

Josh Adams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,534
Rushing yards
3,198
Receiving yards
336
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 PostseasonNotre Dame1278780154
2015 Regular SeasonNotre Dame1279975742654
2016 Regular SeasonNotre Dame121,126933193669.8
2017 PostseasonNotre Dame13634419079.4
2017 Regular SeasonNotre Dame131,4681,38682979.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 1,531 primary output with 64.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 64.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boston College

Win with 238 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

117.8

Efficiency

64.3

Usage

30.3

Consistency

67

Best Game by takeover score

Boston College

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 63. Temple: 161. Georgia: 113. Boston College: 238. Michigan State: 56. Miami (OH): 159. North Carolina: 133. USC: 191. NC State: 200. Wake Forest: 22. Miami: 40. Navy: 106. Stanford: 49

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 18 by 32.9. Temple: 19 by 85.3. Georgia: 25 by 36.3. Boston College: 20 by 99.6. Michigan State: 9 by 64.8. Miami (OH): 8 by 100. North Carolina: 14 by 89.6. USC: 19 by 91.9. NC State: 28 by 76.5. Wake Forest: 5 by 45.8. Miami: 16 by 26. Navy: 18 by 61.3. Stanford: 20 by 25.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins132.9 · Games = 10 · +65.6 vs Losses
Losses67.3 · Games = 3 · -65.6 vs Wins