Player Stats

Zayne Anderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
159
TFL
1.5
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonBYU72-0--039
2016 Regular SeasonBYU79-0--039
2017 Regular SeasonBYU1261-0-2043.2
2018 Regular SeasonBYU43610-1064.7
2019 Regular SeasonBYU2100.50-1045.2
2020 PostseasonBYU114-0-1024
2020 Regular SeasonBYU1137-0-1024

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

BYU paired 3 primary output with 45 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 17.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCF

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · BYU

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.2

Efficiency

17.4

Usage

2.7

Consistency

6.1

Best Game by takeover score

UCF

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 1. Navy: 1. Troy: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. UTSA: 0. Houston: 0. Texas State: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. North Alabama: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0. San Diego State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 4 by 26.7. Navy: 2 by 18.3. Troy: 3 by 12.5. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 7 by 29.2. Texas State: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. North Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Coastal Carolina: 8 by 33.3. San Diego State: 7 by 29.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 10 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -0.2 vs Wins