Player Stats

Jacob Harris College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
987
Receptions
49
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonUCF0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonUCF0-00-
2018 PostseasonUCF5-00100
2018 Regular SeasonUCF5-00100
2019 Regular SeasonUCF1119448167.5
2020 PostseasonUCF10467173.5
2020 Regular SeasonUCF1026472773.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

UCF paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 84.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Kentucky, UCF.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Florida

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · UCF

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

53.9

Efficiency

84.1

Usage

12.9

Consistency

67

Best Game by takeover score

South Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 67. Georgia Tech: 28. East Carolina: 69. Tulsa: 23. Memphis: 26. Tulane: 96. Houston: 7. Temple: 47. Cincinnati: 66. South Florida: 110

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 4 by 100. Georgia Tech: 2 by 93.3. East Carolina: 5 by 92. Tulsa: 3 by 51.1. Memphis: 3 by 57.8. Tulane: 2 by 100. Houston: 1 by 46.7. Temple: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 100. South Florida: 5 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59.5 · Games = 6 · +14 vs Losses
Losses45.5 · Games = 4 · -14 vs Wins