Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2015-2016Marshall
TE • 6'3" • Albany, GA, USA
Emanuel Byrd reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.6
Efficiency
50.9
Consistency
53.4
Season Value
53.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Marshall
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Emanuel Byrd, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Marshall. Emanuel Byrd reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Emanuel Byrd played TE for Marshall. Across 2 tracked seasons, Emanuel Byrd recorded -3 rushing yards, 456 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Marshall.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Marshall paired 214 primary output with 69.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 50.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
22
Efficiency
50.9
Usage
11.6
Consistency
53.4
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 58. Akron: 6. Louisville: 4. Pittsburgh: 11. North Texas: 28. Florida Atlantic: 52. Charlotte: 2. Southern Miss: 2. Old Dominion: 26. Middle Tennessee: 33. Florida International: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. Akron: 1 by 40. Louisville: 1 by 26.7. Pittsburgh: 3 by 24.4. North Texas: 2 by 93.3. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 69.3. Charlotte: 1 by 13.3. Southern Miss: 1 by 13.3. Old Dominion: 3 by 57.8. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 55. Florida International: 2 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/20 | @ Florida International | L 14-31 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 42-17 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Old Dominion | L 14-38 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Southern Miss | L 14-24 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Charlotte | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 27-21 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ North Texas | L 21-38 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Pittsburgh | L 27-43 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Louisville | L 28-59 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Akron | L 38-65 | — | 1 | 6 | 1.5 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 37 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Marshall
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Marshall | 214 | 69.9 | 8.5 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Marshall | 214 | 69.9 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Marshall | 242 | 50.9 | 11.6 | 28 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Charlotte
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 69.3 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Marshall
214 primary output · 69.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
55.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Marshall
55.3
214 primary · 69.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Marshall
53.9
242 primary · 50.9 efficiency · 11.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.7683
Roy · Roy, UT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
456
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.