Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Arizona
WR • 6'1" • 197 lbs • Moreno Valley, CA, USA
Cedric Peterson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.8
Efficiency
78.6
Consistency
49.8
Season Value
59.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Arizona
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cedric Peterson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Arizona. Cedric Peterson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Cedric Peterson played WR for Arizona. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cedric Peterson recorded 784 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Arizona.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Arizona paired 412 primary output with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
34.3
Efficiency
78.6
Usage
10.8
Consistency
49.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 0. Unknown: 16. Texas Tech: 47. UCLA: 44. Colorado: 99. Washington: 64. USC: 13. Stanford: 19. Oregon State: 39. Oregon: 3. Utah: 63. Arizona State: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 26.7. Texas Tech: 1 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 97.8. Colorado: 3 by 100. Washington: 3 by 100. USC: 1 by 86.7. Stanford: 1 by 100. Oregon State: 2 by 100. Oregon: 1 by 20. Utah: 4 by 100. Arizona State: 1 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | @ Arizona State | L 14-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Utah | L 7-35 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Oregon | L 6-34 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Oregon State | L 38-56 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Stanford | L 31-41 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/20 | @ USC | L 14-41 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/13 | vs Washington | L 27-51 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Colorado | W 35-30 | — | 3 | 99 | 33 | 33 | 1 | 75 |
| Sun 9/29 | vs UCLA | W 20-17 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Texas Tech | W 28-14 | — | 1 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 8/25 | @ Hawai'i | L 38-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 47 | 68.9 | 7.7 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona | 57 | 47.8 | 12.2 | 10 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 57 | 47.8 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona | 268 | 68.9 | 10.7 | 211 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona | 412 | 78.6 | 10.8 | 144 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Arizona
412 primary output · 78.6 efficiency · 10.8 usage
59.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Arizona
47.6
268 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 10.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Arizona
33
47 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 7.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7833
Highland · Gilbert, AZ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
784
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.