Usage Score
4.7
Player Dossier
2015-2017Stanford
CB • 6'2" • 197 lbs • San Diego, CA, USA
Quenton Meeks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.7
Efficiency
26.9
Consistency
55.4
Season Value
25.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quenton Meeks, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Stanford. Quenton Meeks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.9 disruption score.
Quenton Meeks played CB for Stanford. Across 3 tracked seasons, Quenton Meeks recorded 80 tackles and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Stanford paired 3 primary output with 30 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
26.9
Usage
4.7
Consistency
55.4
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 1. USC: 0. San Diego State: 0. UCLA: 0. Arizona State: 0. Utah: 1. Oregon: 1. Oregon State: 0. Washington State: 1. Washington: 1. California: 1. Notre Dame: 2.5. USC: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 2 by 18.3. USC: 6 by 25. San Diego State: 7 by 29.2. UCLA: 7 by 29.2. Arizona State: 4 by 16.7. Utah: 4 by 26.7. Oregon: 1 by 14.2. Oregon State: 8 by 33.3. Washington State: 4 by 26.7. Washington: 2 by 18.3. California: 5 by 30.8. Notre Dame: 5 by 45.8. USC: 6 by 35
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ TCU | L 37-39 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ USC | L 28-31 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 38-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs California | W 17-14 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Washington | W 30-22 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Washington State | L 21-24 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 10/27 | @ Oregon State | W 15-14 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | vs Oregon | W 49-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Utah | W 23-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Arizona State | W 34-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs UCLA | W 58-34 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ San Diego State | L 17-20 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ USC | L 24-42 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Stanford | 3 | 30 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 3 | 30 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 8 | 14.5 | 2 | 5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 8 | 14.5 | 2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Stanford | 9.5 | 26.9 | 4.7 | 1.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 9.5 | 26.9 | 4.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Notre Dame
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.3 takeover score.
#3
North Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#4
Kansas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.6 takeover score.
#5
Iowa
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Stanford
3 primary output · 30 efficiency · — usage
35.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Stanford
35.7
3 primary · 30 efficiency · — usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Stanford
25.7
9.5 primary · 26.9 efficiency · 4.7 usage
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8861
Del Norte · Crescent City, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
80
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.