Player Stats

Trenton Irwin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,738
Receptions
152
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 PostseasonStanford8112045.2
2015 Regular SeasonStanford811138045.2
2016 PostseasonStanford1315065.9
2016 Regular SeasonStanford1336437165.9
2017 PostseasonStanford14317070.2
2017 Regular SeasonStanford1440444270.2
2018 Regular SeasonStanford1260685279.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Stanford paired 685 primary output with 74.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 74.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCLA

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Stanford

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

57.1

Efficiency

74.9

Usage

22.5

Consistency

69.3

Best Game by takeover score

UCLA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 31. USC: 31. UC Davis: 28. Oregon: 37. Notre Dame: 57. Utah: 100. Arizona State: 79. Washington State: 80. Washington: 59. Oregon State: 70. UCLA: 103. California: 10

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 5 by 41.3. USC: 5 by 41.3. UC Davis: 3 by 62.2. Oregon: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 5 by 76. Utah: 7 by 95.2. Arizona State: 7 by 75.2. Washington State: 8 by 66.7. Washington: 4 by 98.3. Oregon State: 6 by 77.8. UCLA: 7 by 98.1. California: 1 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.6 · Games = 8 · -25.4 vs Losses
Losses74 · Games = 4 · +25.4 vs Wins