Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2015-2018Michigan
Zach Gentry
TE • 6'8" • 262 lbs • Albuquerque, NM, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Zach Gentry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.6
Consistency
51.2
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan
151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zach Gentry, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan. Zach Gentry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Michigan paired 514 primary output with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Michigan
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
42.8
Efficiency
77.6
Usage
16.3
Consistency
51.2
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 39. Notre Dame: 11. Western Michigan: 10. SMU: 95. Nebraska: 32. Northwestern: 46. Maryland: 112. Wisconsin: 5. Michigan State: 21. Penn State: 18. Rutgers: 42. Indiana: 83
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 36.7. Western Michigan: 1 by 66.7. SMU: 4 by 100. Nebraska: 3 by 71.1. Northwestern: 3 by 100. Maryland: 7 by 100. Wisconsin: 1 by 33.3. Michigan State: 2 by 70. Penn State: 2 by 60. Rutgers: 3 by 93.3. Indiana: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins46.4 · n=10 · +21.4 vs Losses
Losses25 · n=2 · -21.4 vs Wins
First Half38.8 · n=6 · -8 vs Second Half
Second Half46.8 · n=6 · +8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Florida | L 15-41 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Indiana | W 31-20 | — | 2 | 83 | 41.5 | 41.50 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Rutgers | W 42-7 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | W 42-7 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Michigan State | W 21-7 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-13 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Maryland100 receiving yards | W 42-21 | — | 7 | 112 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Northwestern | W 20-17 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nebraska | W 56-10 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs SMU | W 45-20 | — | 4 | 95 | 23.8 | 23.80 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-3 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 303 | 91.1 | 13.8 | 303 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 303 | 91.1 | 13.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 514 | 77.6 | 16.3 | 211 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 514 | 77.6 | 16.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Maryland
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Michigan
514 primary output · 77.6 efficiency · 16.3 usage
61.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
61.3
514 primary · 77.6 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Michigan
61.1
303 primary · 91.1 efficiency · 13.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9248
Eldorado · Albuquerque, NM
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
817
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.