Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Michigan
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA
Grant Perry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.9
Efficiency
52.2
Consistency
40.5
Season Value
38.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Grant Perry, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Michigan. Grant Perry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Michigan paired 307 primary output with 76.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 52.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
17.4
Efficiency
52.2
Usage
14.9
Consistency
40.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 8. Notre Dame: 48. SMU: 12. Nebraska: 5. Maryland: 24. Michigan State: 30. Rutgers: 0. Indiana: 12
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 1 by 53.3. Notre Dame: 5 by 64. SMU: 1 by 80. Nebraska: 4 by 8.3. Maryland: 3 by 53.3. Michigan State: 3 by 66.7. Indiana: 2 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
80 vs SMU
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 128 | 56 | 10.1 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 128 | 56 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 183 | 74.5 | 12.4 | 55 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 307 | 76.4 | 18.6 | 124 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 139 | 52.2 | 14.9 | -168 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 139 | 52.2 | 14.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 81.3 efficiency score.
#4
Florida
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 68 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Michigan
307 primary output · 76.4 efficiency · 18.6 usage
64.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Michigan
45.8
183 primary · 74.5 efficiency · 12.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan
38.1
139 primary · 52.2 efficiency · 14.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8531
Brother Rice · Bloomfield Hills, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
757
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Grant Perry quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit