Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2015-2018Michigan State
Khari Willis
S • 6'0" • 214 lbs • Jackson, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Khari Willis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
36.3
Consistency
50
Season Value
27.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan State
151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khari Willis, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan State. Khari Willis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan State paired 14.5 primary output with 34.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 36.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
36.3
Usage
6.4
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 2. Utah State: 4. Arizona State: 0. Indiana: 0. Central Michigan: 1. Northwestern: 1. Penn State: 1. Michigan: 2. Purdue: 0. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 0.5. Nebraska: 2. Rutgers: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 3 by 32.5. Utah State: 7 by 69.2. Arizona State: 6 by 25. Indiana: 4 by 16.7. Central Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Northwestern: 5 by 30.8. Penn State: 9 by 47.5. Michigan: 8 by 53.3. Purdue: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 9 by 37.5. Ohio State: 15 by 55. Nebraska: 6 by 45. Rutgers: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · n=6 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · n=7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | @ Oregon | L 6-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Rutgers | W 14-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Nebraska | L 6-9 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Ohio State10+ tackles | L 6-26 | 15 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Maryland | W 24-3 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Purdue | W 23-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Michigan | L 7-21 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Penn State | W 21-17 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Northwestern | L 19-29 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Indiana | W 35-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Arizona State | L 13-16 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Utah State | W 38-31 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 2 | 16.1 | 2.2 | 2 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 14.5 | 34.7 | 17.2 | 12.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 14.5 | 34.7 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 13.5 | 36.3 | 6.4 | -1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 13.5 | 36.3 | 6.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65.8 takeover score.
#2
Utah State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.8 takeover score.
#3
Iowa
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#5
Washington State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
14.5 primary output · 34.7 efficiency · 17.2 usage
30.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan State
30.6
14.5 primary · 34.7 efficiency · 17.2 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan State
27.3
13.5 primary · 36.3 efficiency · 6.4 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9822
Thompson · Alabaster, AL
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
185
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.