Player Dossier

2016-2019

Michigan State

Raequan Williams

DT • 6'4" • 303 lbs • Chicago, IL, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Raequan Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.5 disruption score.

Usage Score

7.5

Efficiency

26.5

Consistency

54.3

Season Value

30

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan State

16171718181919

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Michigan State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Raequan Williams, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan State. Raequan Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.5 disruption score.

Raequan Williams played DT for Michigan State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Raequan Williams recorded 156 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Michigan State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Michigan State paired 17.5 primary output with 31.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Michigan State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

26.5

Usage

7.5

Consistency

54.3

Best Game by takeover score

Wake Forest

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 0.5. Tulsa: 1. Western Michigan: 0. Arizona State: 2. Northwestern: 3. Indiana: 2.5. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Penn State: 0. Illinois: 1.5. Michigan: 2. Rutgers: 1. Maryland: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 7 by 34.2. Tulsa: 3 by 22.5. Western Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Arizona State: 3 by 32.5. Northwestern: 2 by 38.3. Indiana: 5 by 45.8. Ohio State: 8 by 33.3. Wisconsin: 3 by 12.5. Penn State: 4 by 16.7. Illinois: 2 by 23.3. Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Rutgers: 5 by 30.8. Maryland: 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 7 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · Games = 7 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Northwestern

Best efficiency game

45.8 vs Indiana

Result
Fri 12/27@ Wake ForestW 27-21720.5000
Sat 11/30vs MarylandW 19-16200.500.500
Sat 11/23@ RutgersW 27-051001
Sat 11/16@ MichiganL 10-4432110
Sat 11/9vs IllinoisL 34-37210.5001
Sat 10/26vs Penn StateL 7-2841000
Sat 10/12@ WisconsinL 0-3831000
Sat 10/5@ Ohio StateL 10-3485000
Sat 9/28vs IndianaW 40-31521.5010
Sat 9/21@ NorthwesternSplash gameW 31-1022210
Sat 9/14vs Arizona StateL 7-1030110
Sat 9/7vs Western MichiganW 51-1710000
Fri 8/30vs TulsaW 28-7300.500.500

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Michigan State

    2016-2019

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2016201720172018201820192019
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2016 Regular SeasonMichigan State819.78.7
2017 PostseasonMichigan State8.516.59.60.5
2017 Regular SeasonMichigan State8.516.59.60
2018 PostseasonMichigan State17.531.68.59
2018 Regular SeasonMichigan State17.531.68.50
2019 PostseasonMichigan State14.526.57.5-3
2019 Regular SeasonMichigan State14.526.57.50

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Indiana

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

4

Primary metric

4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.

#2

Northwestern

3

Primary metric

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.

#3

Rutgers

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.6 takeover score.

#4

Wisconsin

2

Primary metric

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.

#5

Indiana

2.5

Primary metric

Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.3 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2018 Postseason · Michigan State

17.5 primary output · 31.6 efficiency · 8.5 usage

35

#2

2018 Regular Season · Michigan State

35

17.5 primary · 31.6 efficiency · 8.5 usage

#3

2019 Postseason · Michigan State

30

14.5 primary · 26.5 efficiency · 7.5 usage

Milestones

0

Impact games

2

Splash games

0

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2015 · Rating 0.9176

DePaul College Prep · Chicago, IL

Committed To
Michigan State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2015

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

156

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.