Player Stats

Kenny Willekes College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
227
TFL
50.5
Sacks
25
QB hurries
36
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonMichigan State10-0-1028.1
2017 PostseasonMichigan State134-01-067.6
2017 Regular SeasonMichigan State1368146.572067.6
2018 PostseasonMichigan State132-0--078.7
2018 Regular SeasonMichigan State137520.58121078.7
2019 PostseasonMichigan State1391.51.5--078.9
2019 Regular SeasonMichigan State136914.5916-078.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Michigan State paired 42.5 primary output with 54.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 54.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Loss with 7.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Michigan State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

3.3

Efficiency

54.2

Usage

15.5

Consistency

61.4

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 3. Tulsa: 4. Western Michigan: 7. Arizona State: 7.5. Northwestern: 2. Indiana: 1. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 1. Penn State: 1. Illinois: 5. Michigan: 3. Rutgers: 3. Maryland: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 9 by 67.5. Tulsa: 7 by 69.2. Western Michigan: 5 by 70.8. Arizona State: 7 by 79.2. Northwestern: 3 by 32.5. Indiana: 12 by 60. Ohio State: 7 by 29.2. Wisconsin: 5 by 30.8. Penn State: 3 by 22.5. Illinois: 6 by 75. Michigan: 4 by 46.7. Rutgers: 4 by 46.7. Maryland: 6 by 75

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.6 · Games = 7 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses2.9 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Wins