Usage Score
27.4
Player Dossier
2016-2019Michigan State
Darrell Stewart Jr.
WR • 6'2" • 216 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Darrell Stewart Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.6
Consistency
58
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan State
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darrell Stewart Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan State. Darrell Stewart Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Michigan State paired 697 primary output with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
77.4
Efficiency
76.6
Usage
27.4
Consistency
58
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 3. Tulsa: 56. Western Michigan: 185. Arizona State: 121. Northwestern: 77. Indiana: 117. Ohio State: 68. Wisconsin: 59. Penn State: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 2 by 10. Tulsa: 6 by 62.2. Western Michigan: 10 by 100. Arizona State: 9 by 89.6. Northwestern: 5 by 100. Indiana: 5 by 100. Ohio State: 6 by 75.6. Wisconsin: 5 by 78.7. Penn State: 1 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins87.6 · n=5 · +22.8 vs Losses
Losses64.8 · n=4 · -22.8 vs Wins
First Half88.4 · n=5 · +24.7 vs Second Half
Second Half63.8 · n=4 · -24.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | @ Wake Forest | W 27-21 | — | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.50 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Penn State | L 7-28 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-38 | — | 5 | 59 | 9 | 11.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ohio State | L 10-34 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Indiana100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 40-31 | — | 5 | 117 | 23.4 | 23.40 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Northwestern | W 31-10 | — | 5 | 77 | 11.5 | 15.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 7-10 | — | 9 | 121 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-17 | — | 10 | 185 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 42 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Tulsa | W 28-7 | — | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 29 | 62.2 | 5.6 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 501 | 65.4 | 21.6 | 472 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 501 | 65.4 | 21.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 413 | 63.8 | 24.1 | -88 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 413 | 63.8 | 24.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan State | 697 | 76.6 | 27.4 | 284 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 697 | 76.6 | 27.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
185
Primary metric
185 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Purdue
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
#4
Wisconsin
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Michigan State
697 primary output · 76.6 efficiency · 27.4 usage
65.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
65.3
697 primary · 76.6 efficiency · 27.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan State
54.1
413 primary · 63.8 efficiency · 24.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7933
Oak Hills · Hesperia, CA
- Committed To
- New Mexico State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,640
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.