Usage Score
3.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Michigan State
S • 6'1" • 209 lbs • North Ridgeville, OH, USA
David Dowell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.8
Efficiency
20.3
Consistency
5.1
Season Value
8.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Dowell, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Michigan State. David Dowell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.3 disruption score.
David Dowell played S for Michigan State. Across 4 tracked seasons, David Dowell recorded 163 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
20.3
Usage
3.8
Consistency
5.1
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 0. Tulsa: 0. Western Michigan: 1.5. Arizona State: 0. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 0. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Penn State: 2. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 0. Rutgers: 0. Maryland: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 4 by 16.7. Tulsa: 2 by 8.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 35.8. Arizona State: 3 by 12.5. Northwestern: 4 by 16.7. Indiana: 8 by 33.3. Ohio State: 3 by 12.5. Wisconsin: 6 by 25. Penn State: 5 by 40.8. Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | @ Wake Forest | W 27-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Maryland | W 19-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Rutgers | W 27-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Michigan | L 10-44 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Illinois | L 34-37 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Penn State | L 7-28 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-38 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ohio State | L 10-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Indiana | W 40-31 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Northwestern | W 31-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arizona State | L 7-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 51-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Tulsa | W 28-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 9 | 25.1 | 7.9 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 9 | 25.1 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 4 | 22 | 4.6 | -5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | 22 | 4.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan State | 3.5 | 20.3 | 3.8 | -0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 3.5 | 20.3 | 3.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#2
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50 takeover score.
#3
Central Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.5 takeover score.
#4
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43 takeover score.
#5
Western Michigan
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 39.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35
#2
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
15.8
9 primary · 25.1 efficiency · 7.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Michigan State
15.8
9 primary · 25.1 efficiency · 7.9 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8964
St. Edward · Lakewood, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
163
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.