Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2015-2018Michigan State
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • North Ridgeville, OH, USA
Andrew Dowell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 47 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.1
Efficiency
47
Consistency
54.9
Season Value
33.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Dowell, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan State. Andrew Dowell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 47 disruption score.
Andrew Dowell played LB for Michigan State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Andrew Dowell recorded 239 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Michigan State paired 21.5 primary output with 47 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 47 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
47
Usage
10.1
Consistency
54.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 2. Utah State: 0. Arizona State: 2. Indiana: 4. Central Michigan: 1. Northwestern: 0. Penn State: 1. Michigan: 4. Purdue: 3. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 1. Nebraska: 2. Rutgers: 1.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 7 by 49.2. Utah State: 6 by 25. Arizona State: 6 by 45. Indiana: 9 by 77.5. Central Michigan: 6 by 35. Northwestern: 7 by 29.2. Penn State: 7 by 39.2. Michigan: 10 by 81.7. Purdue: 4 by 46.7. Maryland: 6 by 25. Ohio State: 14 by 60. Nebraska: 10 by 61.7. Rutgers: 5 by 35.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | @ Oregon | L 6-7 | 7 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Rutgers | W 14-10 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Nebraska10+ tackles | L 6-9 | 10 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Ohio State10+ tackles | L 6-26 | 14 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Maryland | W 24-3 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Purdue | W 23-13 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Michigan10+ tackles · Splash game | L 7-21 | 10 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Penn State | W 21-17 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Northwestern | L 19-29 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-20 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Indiana2+ sacks · Splash game | W 35-21 | 9 | 7 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Arizona StateSplash game | L 13-16 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Utah State | W 38-31 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 8 | 29.9 | 6.9 | 8 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 8.5 | 30.6 | 6.3 | 0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 8.5 | 30.6 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 21.5 | 47 | 10.1 | 13 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 21.5 | 47 | 10.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 67.9 takeover score.
#2
Indiana
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.1 takeover score.
#3
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.5 takeover score.
#4
Ohio State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#5
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Michigan State
21.5 primary output · 47 efficiency · 10.1 usage
33.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · Michigan State
33.9
21.5 primary · 47 efficiency · 10.1 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
22.1
8.5 primary · 30.6 efficiency · 6.3 usage
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.892
St. Edward · Lakewood, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
239
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.