Player Stats

Felton Davis III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,450
Receptions
100
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 PostseasonMichigan State2128055.4
2015 Regular SeasonMichigan State2122055.4
2016 Regular SeasonMichigan State512150152.6
2017 PostseasonMichigan State114118180.4
2017 Regular SeasonMichigan State1151658880.4
2018 Regular SeasonMichigan State631474580.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Michigan State paired 474 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Michigan State

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

79

Efficiency

93.3

Usage

23

Consistency

91.9

Best Game by takeover score

Penn State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 69. Arizona State: 64. Indiana: 79. Central Michigan: 66. Northwestern: 96. Penn State: 100

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 5 by 85.3. Indiana: 5 by 100. Central Michigan: 3 by 100. Northwestern: 7 by 91.4. Penn State: 8 by 83.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins78.5 · Games = 4 · -1.5 vs Losses
Losses80 · Games = 2 · +1.5 vs Wins